Timeline for What to do with authors who ignore all the criticisms and suggestions from reviewers?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2022 at 21:47 | comment | added | Kaz | If they have decided not to address the points, why are they bothering the reviewer with another round of review? That's the question. | |
| Sep 13, 2022 at 14:12 | comment | added | Clumsy cat | If the "changes are beyond the scope of this paper", this can be part of the replay to the reviewer, and sometimes it should also be mentioned in the paper itself. e.g. "Investigating foogle would be a more complete study of lampflow, but that is beyond the scope of this text." | |
| Sep 13, 2022 at 12:08 | comment | added | Wrzlprmft♦ | While they haven’t technically ignored the remarks, for the purpose of the review it’s almost equivalent. Nothing happened and you have almost no idea why. The main difference is that it’s a little less impolite and you can exclude that it was accidental. | |
| Sep 12, 2022 at 18:44 | history | answered | Buffy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |