Timeline for Submitting revised manuscript long before due date
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2022 at 1:21 | vote | accept | Med Med | ||
| Sep 12, 2022 at 21:32 | |||||
| Aug 2, 2022 at 1:18 | vote | accept | Med Med | ||
| Aug 2, 2022 at 1:19 | |||||
| Aug 1, 2022 at 3:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1553938571131764736 | ||
| Jul 31, 2022 at 21:00 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Jul 31, 2022 at 15:48 | comment | added | erstwhile editor | " The first reviewer recommended accept after major revision." So the referee thought that a major revision of the paper was suitable for the journal and implicitly that the paper in its present form is not suitable. You have now made some minor revisions. (And explained that you intend to keep the good stuff for later papers .... ) I wouldn't be surprised if you now got from the editor "not in present form although willing to consider a new version dealing with the issues previously raised". | |
| Jul 31, 2022 at 13:14 | comment | added | Med Med | The question has been edited. | |
| Jul 31, 2022 at 13:14 | answer | added | Buffy | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jul 31, 2022 at 13:12 | history | edited | Med Med | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Jul 31, 2022 at 13:07 | comment | added | Allure | What's the question? There's no question mark in what you've written. | |
| Jul 31, 2022 at 12:58 | history | asked | Med Med | CC BY-SA 4.0 |