Timeline for Why would a top department hire a less experienced researcher for a tenure-track position?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2023 at 18:02 | answer | added | HaleyMiranda | timeline score: -2 | |
| S Jun 18, 2023 at 10:54 | history | suggested | can't stop me now | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed typos
|
| Jun 18, 2023 at 2:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 18, 2023 at 10:54 | |||||
| Dec 5, 2016 at 16:49 | comment | added | If you do not know- just GIS | they are often cheaper and they may have budget issues. | |
| Apr 9, 2015 at 15:04 | vote | accept | Dnuorg Spu | ||
| Mar 29, 2014 at 16:53 | comment | added | dearN | This just happened in my department. (mechanical engineering). The less experienced researcher, in this case, is yet to defend his PhD but was offered a tenure track job starting in Sep 2014 because he is working on a topic that is the in thing now. This is at a US university. | |
| Mar 29, 2014 at 9:11 | answer | added | Ben Webster | timeline score: 15 | |
| Mar 29, 2014 at 8:13 | comment | added | Ben Webster | Do top departments really hire freshly-minted PhDs for tenure-track positions? Depends on your discipline. If they are interviewing them, then probably they do hire them from time to time. In mathematics, the answer is "No, of course not," but in mathematics, such candidates don't get interviews. | |
| Mar 28, 2014 at 23:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/449682461036146688 | ||
| Mar 28, 2014 at 20:14 | history | edited | Dnuorg Spu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2014 at 20:13 | answer | added | Stephan Kolassa | timeline score: 30 | |
| Mar 28, 2014 at 19:31 | comment | added | ff524 | +1 for the question "Or are they just panning for gold?" - I often wonder the same thing. | |
| Mar 28, 2014 at 19:23 | history | asked | Dnuorg Spu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |