Timeline for Can I call out a researcher for using Maple without citing it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
22 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 13, 2021 at 20:19 | answer | added | Yakk | timeline score: 3 | |
Aug 12, 2021 at 23:54 | comment | added | cag51♦ | There was some discussion below (on one of the answers) that we should perhaps separate the two issues of (1) whether the authors did anything wrong, and (2) whether "calling them out" is an appropriate response to a perceived transgression. At this point I think the question stands as-is, just documenting this discussion for posterity. | |
S Aug 12, 2021 at 23:48 | history | mod moved comments to chat | |||
S Aug 12, 2021 at 23:48 | comment | added | cag51♦ | Some good discussion here; I have preserved the most important bits and moved the rest to chat. Please use the chat for future discussion; comments below this one should conform to this FAQ | |
Aug 12, 2021 at 10:50 | answer | added | Houska | timeline score: 5 | |
Aug 12, 2021 at 4:34 | answer | added | Kuba hasn't forgotten Monica | timeline score: 5 | |
Aug 12, 2021 at 0:27 | answer | added | Viktor Toth | timeline score: 28 | |
Aug 11, 2021 at 16:02 | answer | added | BioPhysicist | timeline score: 15 | |
Aug 11, 2021 at 14:09 | review | Suggested edits | |||
Aug 11, 2021 at 17:27 | |||||
Aug 11, 2021 at 0:31 | comment | added | Massimo Ortolano | Related: academia.stackexchange.com/q/71536/20058 | |
Aug 11, 2021 at 0:16 | answer | added | Dan Romik | timeline score: 158 | |
Aug 10, 2021 at 22:01 | history | became hot network question | |||
Aug 10, 2021 at 16:11 | answer | added | Terry Loring | timeline score: 80 | |
Aug 10, 2021 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1425109732373696519 | ||
Aug 10, 2021 at 14:37 | comment | added | user9482 | @Buffy academia.stackexchange.com/questions/11655/… | |
Aug 10, 2021 at 14:34 | comment | added | Buffy | Why should a commercial product need a citation? Any commercial product? Word? Win11? | |
Aug 10, 2021 at 14:21 | comment | added | user3508551 | Good points. Thanks both. Feel free to change your comments to answers. I’ll most likely go with Roland’s message + Ben’s hedge | |
Aug 10, 2021 at 14:20 | answer | added | Ben Bolker | timeline score: 41 | |
Aug 10, 2021 at 14:14 | comment | added | user9482 | Why do you need such evidence? If they decide to make that argument, so be it. They might decide to simply add the citation. | |
Aug 10, 2021 at 14:13 | comment | added | user3508551 | @Roland I want to write that, but I simply don’t have enough evidence to back that up. They could argue they reached those exact steps independently.. | |
Aug 10, 2021 at 14:11 | comment | added | user9482 | Is their a reason why you can't simply write "It appears like a CAS was used to perform steps x, y, and z. The authors should cite the software." | |
Aug 10, 2021 at 13:57 | history | asked | user3508551 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |