Timeline for Why do some textbooks lack the 'references section' completely?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2021 at 21:00 | history | edited | henning no longer feeds AI | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Jun 4, 2021 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1400920312531800071 | ||
| Jun 4, 2021 at 20:05 | answer | added | Buffy | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 4, 2021 at 19:55 | comment | added | Sachin | @Buffy , I have examined it very carefully. Checked it all. | |
| Jun 4, 2021 at 19:50 | comment | added | GoodDeeds | @Buffy I see, thanks, but then I guess that's an answer to this question then? | |
| Jun 4, 2021 at 19:49 | comment | added | Buffy | @GoodDeeds, many do, but textbook knowledge is considered "settled" in most cases so few, if any, are required. Some might have a "Further Reading' section somewhere. | |
| Jun 4, 2021 at 19:48 | comment | added | GoodDeeds | Is having references the norm? I have seen many textbooks that have them, and many that don't. | |
| Jun 4, 2021 at 19:45 | comment | added | Buffy | How carefully did you examine it. Some books put references at the ends of chapters, others in footnotes. If you just looked at an index you might have been misled. | |
| Jun 4, 2021 at 19:35 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 4, 2021 at 21:01 | |||||
| Jun 4, 2021 at 19:34 | history | asked | Sachin | CC BY-SA 4.0 |