Skip to main content
20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 13, 2020 at 20:51 answer added Greg timeline score: -1
Nov 13, 2020 at 18:54 answer added Flyto timeline score: 1
Nov 13, 2020 at 13:46 answer added steve_b timeline score: 3
Nov 13, 2020 at 12:50 comment added Ink blot Apologize, apologize, apologize. Hope you're not burning bridges (because the word may very well travel), and if at all possible, offer to still collaborate on a project in the foreseeable future (and try to live up to this offer, don't use it just as appeasement).
Nov 13, 2020 at 5:34 comment added uhoh Not a direct answer to your question, and doesn't apply literally, but may apply to the fast-decision-making process: academia.stackexchange.com/a/155619
Nov 12, 2020 at 21:53 comment added Tom I think you could maybe get away with it at PhD level, but beyond you likely can't as it will affect your reputation. Academia is a small world so creating bad blood is a bad idea.
Nov 12, 2020 at 20:30 comment added lighthouse keeper @Tom Even at the PhD level one should be careful (even more so in countries where PhD students receive a salary).
S Nov 12, 2020 at 18:32 history suggested RLH CC BY-SA 4.0
reject -> decline (A person offering a job can reject applicants, but a person seeking a job declines offers)
Nov 12, 2020 at 18:30 review Suggested edits
S Nov 12, 2020 at 18:32
Nov 12, 2020 at 15:56 comment added JBentley Note that (jurisdiction dependent) contracts generally do not have to be signed to be accepted, so the fact that you did or didn't sign is not a relevant factor. Signtures are used to prove that acceptance took place, but are not themselves the act of acceptance (although the two can coincide).
Nov 11, 2020 at 16:53 comment added Tom Yes you have to be a bit careful doing this sort of thing beyond PhD level
Nov 11, 2020 at 9:19 comment added Dmitry Grigoryev Whatever inconvenience your late rejection will cause, it cannot compare to the damage from accepting the offer you don't feel happy about. By refusing now you'll minimize the damage for everyone, which is anything but unethical.
Nov 11, 2020 at 0:10 answer added John L Darby timeline score: 18
Nov 10, 2020 at 22:57 history became hot network question
Nov 10, 2020 at 18:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1326223147067187204
Nov 10, 2020 at 15:52 answer added Captain Emacs timeline score: 41
Nov 10, 2020 at 15:38 comment added lighthouse keeper If you're sure, you need to act as quickly as possible to control the damage. The PI might not have rejected the other candidates yet.
Nov 10, 2020 at 15:26 answer added Buffy timeline score: 7
Nov 10, 2020 at 15:00 review First posts
Nov 10, 2020 at 15:20
Nov 10, 2020 at 14:57 history asked rooms CC BY-SA 4.0