Timeline for How to summarize the contributions of co-authors where they advised at all stages of the study, but technically only stepped in at the writing stage
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2020 at 17:43 | comment | added | Azor Ahai -him- | Who is ABC? You? | |
| Oct 8, 2020 at 10:22 | answer | added | user2768 | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 7, 2020 at 23:42 | review | Close votes | |||
| Oct 12, 2020 at 9:02 | |||||
| Oct 7, 2020 at 23:23 | comment | added | Buffy | This is an opinion based question, so I won't give a formal answer. But I think that you gain much by being generous in such matters. People outside your own circle won't be keeping score. People can contribute "equally" without contributing in the same way. | |
| Oct 7, 2020 at 23:04 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | IMO, choosing the analysis methodology for most studies is the primary intellectual contribution to data analysis. Sometimes the actual necessary programming is quite time consuming, but that's not necessarily what counts for authorship. | |
| Oct 7, 2020 at 23:00 | comment | added | sleepy | Good point. What about analysis? If I am conducting all the analysis but they are advising, i.e. what tests to do, which variables to drop from a model (or whatever, made up examples), is this covered in "conception of the study"? | |
| Oct 7, 2020 at 22:58 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | If they didn't collect data, you could drop that, but isn't "contributed to conception of the study" accurate for people who gave advice from start to finish? That's exactly what contributes to the conception and design of a study. | |
| Oct 7, 2020 at 22:43 | history | asked | sleepy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |