Timeline for What to use instead of academic 'we' when describing an experiment?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
22 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 5, 2022 at 9:31 | answer | added | user3352632 | timeline score: 0 | |
Feb 8, 2019 at 3:13 | comment | added | Dawn | The study included 56 participants. For each sentence, identify the key verb. You are off track because you have focused on conducted as the key verb. Maybe you can aso avoid mentioning a person if you make the subject the study or the paper. | |
Feb 7, 2019 at 15:34 | answer | added | guest | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 7, 2019 at 9:07 | answer | added | hplieninger | timeline score: 2 | |
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://academia.stackexchange.com/ with https://academia.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Jan 23, 2014 at 12:46 | answer | added | cbeleites | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 23, 2014 at 12:01 | history | edited | Piotr Migdal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Tittle subtly changed and one paragraph moved to the bottom
|
Jan 23, 2014 at 1:05 | history | edited | rumtscho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 510 characters in body
|
Jan 23, 2014 at 1:04 | answer | added | Federico Poloni | timeline score: 20 | |
Jan 23, 2014 at 1:01 | answer | added | rumtscho | timeline score: 0 | |
Jan 23, 2014 at 0:53 | answer | added | user1574546 | timeline score: 2 | |
Jan 4, 2014 at 16:46 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/419510226019438592 | ||
Jan 4, 2014 at 13:37 | history | edited | Peter Jansson |
retag
|
|
Jan 4, 2014 at 13:36 | answer | added | silvado | timeline score: 2 | |
Jan 4, 2014 at 13:35 | answer | added | Peter Jansson | timeline score: 5 | |
Jan 4, 2014 at 12:59 | history | edited | Bravo |
edited tags
|
|
Jan 4, 2014 at 11:31 | comment | added | rumtscho | @scaahu I rewrote it completely, to point out how it differs from the situation to which the answer of the other question applies | |
Jan 4, 2014 at 11:30 | history | edited | rumtscho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
rewrote question to only contain the part which differs from the existing earlier question
|
Jan 4, 2014 at 11:18 | review | First posts | |||
Jan 4, 2014 at 12:07 | |||||
Jan 4, 2014 at 11:15 | comment | added | rumtscho | @scaaahu it is a dupe, thank you for pointing it out. But the answers there don't help me, as the highly upvoted one assumes that I am making a proof. I can't say "One performed a study with 56 participants", etc. :( Maybe I will think of ways to re-write my question. | |
Jan 4, 2014 at 11:07 | comment | added | Nobody | I am almost sure this is duplicate of academia.stackexchange.com/q/2945/546. The only difference I can tell is that you're working on PhD thesis. Have you talked to your advisor yet? | |
Jan 4, 2014 at 11:02 | history | asked | rumtscho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |