Timeline for Are summarized reviewer comments a thing?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2020 at 8:44 | comment | added | lighthouse keeper | @darijgrinberg It's a possibility, but I believe that the sane thing to do for the editor in this case would be to disclose that it's a summary rather than the actual review. | |
| Feb 20, 2020 at 19:27 | comment | added | OnMyWayOut | @darijgrinberg one of the reviews was short yet very positive | |
| Feb 20, 2020 at 17:52 | comment | added | darij grinberg | "It basically never happens that the actual reviewer feedback is hidden from the authors, and I don't see a point for doing so." I imagine this could happen if the original reviewer feedback was so strongly worded (usually in the negative sense) that the editor didn't want to pass it on in that form. | |
| Feb 20, 2020 at 16:01 | vote | accept | OnMyWayOut | ||
| Feb 20, 2020 at 15:54 | comment | added | OnMyWayOut | many thanks for your explanations. three coincidentally extremely short reviews would be rather unlikely, I suppose. I might ask the editor, but I moved on in the meantime, so it would just be out of curiosity. | |
| Feb 20, 2020 at 15:50 | history | answered | lighthouse keeper | CC BY-SA 4.0 |