We’re rewarding the question askers & reputations are being recalculated! Read more.
2 minor spelling and grammar
source | link

My advice is to get a read of the paper or take your name off (and ask them not to use any of your work (tests, samples, etc.)

NOTE: this does NOT mean setting yourself up as an editor or nitpicker or gatekeeper or the like. Just make sure the parts that are your work are accurate. As for the rest of the paper, just make sure that it is not so scientifically crazy you don't want your name on it (pretty low hurdle). Other than that, let the first author do hisher thing in terms of describing work, structure, wording, journal choice, etc.

Obviously get your advisor involved. But if you don't see the paper, don't let your name be used (even if he isthey are OK with that for himthem).

My advice is to get a read of the paper or take your name off (and ask them not to use any of your work (tests, samples, etc.)

NOTE: this does NOT mean setting yourself up as an editor or nitpicker or gatekeeper or the like. Just make sure the parts that are your work are accurate. As for the rest of the paper, just make sure that it is not so scientifically crazy you don't want your name on it (pretty low hurdle). Other than that, let the first author do his thing in terms of describing work, structure, wording, journal choice, etc.

Obviously get your advisor involved. But if you don't see the paper, don't let your name be used (even if he is OK with that for him).

My advice is to get a read of the paper or take your name off (and ask them not to use any of your work (tests, samples, etc.)

NOTE: this does NOT mean setting yourself up as an editor or nitpicker or gatekeeper or the like. Just make sure the parts that are your work are accurate. As for the rest of the paper, just make sure that it is not so scientifically crazy you don't want your name on it (pretty low hurdle). Other than that, let the first author do her thing in terms of describing work, structure, wording, journal choice, etc.

Obviously get your advisor involved. But if you don't see the paper, don't let your name be used (even if they are OK with that for them).

1
source | link

My advice is to get a read of the paper or take your name off (and ask them not to use any of your work (tests, samples, etc.)

NOTE: this does NOT mean setting yourself up as an editor or nitpicker or gatekeeper or the like. Just make sure the parts that are your work are accurate. As for the rest of the paper, just make sure that it is not so scientifically crazy you don't want your name on it (pretty low hurdle). Other than that, let the first author do his thing in terms of describing work, structure, wording, journal choice, etc.

Obviously get your advisor involved. But if you don't see the paper, don't let your name be used (even if he is OK with that for him).