Timeline for Complaining about an ISI journal's unreasonable behavior
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2018 at 4:23 | answer | added | Allure | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 2, 2013 at 3:01 | review | Community Evaluations | |||
| Dec 9, 2013 at 3:01 | |||||
| Oct 23, 2013 at 7:41 | answer | added | Yuichiro Fujiwara | timeline score: 16 | |
| Oct 23, 2013 at 3:34 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackAcademia/status/392856635246657537 | ||
| Oct 22, 2013 at 18:18 | comment | added | Benoît Kloeckner | I do not see much you can do, apart from informing Thompson (not likely to be useful); but this story shows how open archives protect authors: had you put your paper in a repository before submitting, you would have a stamp of anteriority and the damage done by the journal would be less dramatic. | |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 17:34 | comment | added | Penguin_Knight | I'd suggest taking this as a learning experience that if the wait time exceeds their reported duration by ___ months, you'll send a letter to retract and then submit to another place so that you're less likely to be scooped again. And my research team had one that reached 4+ years. I was done and left the team so not sure if it's published/rejected/undecided. | |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 14:15 | comment | added | Anonymous Mathematician | To complain to the journal, you can just send them an e-mail. On the other hand, you aren't going to get them eliminated from Thomson's lists. | |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 14:04 | comment | added | F'x | @golin I tried to make your question clearer, and edited some of the language. I hope (and think) the original intent is retained | |
| Oct 22, 2013 at 14:03 | history | edited | F'x | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 294 characters in body
|
| Oct 22, 2013 at 13:40 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 22, 2013 at 13:43 | |||||
| Oct 22, 2013 at 13:23 | history | asked | golin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |