Timeline for Extended paper - should I keep someone who virtually had no contribution?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2019 at 5:25 | comment | added | Poidah | Probably best to ask your other co-authors and garner their advice. The answer is mainly political rather than set in stone. | |
| Aug 21, 2019 at 8:10 | comment | added | kalman-man | Yes, all colleagues at the same level as myself in the hierarchy. They're all against including the PI, they even didn't want me to include him in the conference version (as I said, I did it because of politics and because he was still there when the idea was being cooked -- by me). We all had problems in the past with the PI regarding undeserved authorships. | |
| Aug 20, 2019 at 21:32 | comment | added | seteropere | Beside him, Do you have other co-authors? Have you talked to them about it? what was their opinion? | |
| Aug 20, 2019 at 19:59 | answer | added | Carl Christian | timeline score: 0 | |
| Aug 20, 2019 at 8:10 | comment | added | user9482 | You write "virtually had no contribution" which is crucially different from "literally had no contribution". | |
| Aug 20, 2019 at 7:33 | answer | added | Spark | timeline score: 6 | |
| Aug 20, 2019 at 7:16 | history | edited | kalman-man | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Aug 19, 2019 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1163556271292854272 | ||
| Aug 19, 2019 at 10:07 | answer | added | Solar Mike | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 19, 2019 at 9:50 | history | asked | kalman-man | CC BY-SA 4.0 |