Timeline for Has a journal ever switched between being a predatory journal and a reputable one?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 14:12 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Feb 12, 2019 at 19:55 | history | edited | iayork | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Expanded with more info
|
| Feb 12, 2019 at 19:48 | comment | added | iayork | You know, I assumed it was the former (journals becoming predatory) and I am still morally sure of it, but now you ask I suppose it's possible that OMICS is trying to become legit. I'll edit the answer to clarify. | |
| Feb 11, 2019 at 22:39 | comment | added | PLL | So is this an instance of a predatory publisher raising its content standards and going legitimate, or respected journals getting taken over and becoming predatory, or are they meeting somewhere in the middle (shoddy scientific practices but not outright misconduct)? | |
| Feb 11, 2019 at 20:26 | history | answered | iayork | CC BY-SA 4.0 |