Timeline for Is this an academic discourtesy?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2019 at 11:34 | answer | added | jakebeal | timeline score: 1 | |
| S Jan 26, 2019 at 17:44 | history | suggested | Javier Enciso |
Interesting! Adding tags to improve visibility.
|
|
| Jan 26, 2019 at 16:05 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 26, 2019 at 17:44 | |||||
| Jan 22, 2019 at 12:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1087681531672514560 | ||
| Jan 5, 2019 at 15:43 | comment | added | user2768 | Disregarding the fact that the editor has seen your work, this is a case of another researcher not citing relating work. Maybe take a look at academia.stackexchange.com/questions/49208/… | |
| Dec 31, 2018 at 9:37 | comment | added | Solar Mike | Welcome to the world of the kind, altruistic editor and sometimes reviewers... Learn from this and good luck. | |
| Dec 31, 2018 at 0:02 | comment | added | ResearcherF | Thank you for this clarification. What I certainly know is, the editor's article was definitely NOT submitted before ours was as this is documented in the publications themselves - the information about submission is made public, in print, so I know exactly who submitted what, when. We were surprised by the fact that we had been told in the review process that the anonymous human subject we wrote about would not wish to be made the focus of our article …. and yet the editor him/herself (who told us this) then promptly produced an article on just that same topic! | |
| Dec 30, 2018 at 23:52 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | Ethically speaking, the editor only "really" became able to consider incorporating your article after it was published. Yes, she knew about the article during the review process, but it would be unethical of her to take advantage of this early access. So if you view it as "an article published a few weeks after ours didn't mention us", it seems unsurprising, since that isn't much time to add mention of new work. It's even possible that the editor had already submitted their article before yours was published, in which case there is no way they could mention yours at all. | |
| Dec 30, 2018 at 23:45 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 30, 2018 at 23:45 | |||||
| Dec 30, 2018 at 23:43 | history | asked | ResearcherF | CC BY-SA 4.0 |