Timeline for Is it unethical to not able to complete a journal review within provided time ?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2018 at 18:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1062404973366009856 | ||
| Nov 11, 2018 at 9:59 | vote | accept | krammer | ||
| Nov 10, 2018 at 22:41 | answer | added | Ben | timeline score: -2 | |
| Nov 10, 2018 at 21:10 | answer | added | JamesM | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 10, 2018 at 19:47 | answer | added | Dan Romik | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 10, 2018 at 16:18 | comment | added | Buffy | @virmaior, your comment should probably be developed into a full answer. | |
| Nov 10, 2018 at 15:13 | comment | added | virmaior | @user2357 I think the category that might be ethically relevant is accepting to review while knowing (or reasonably believing) you will be unable to ... | |
| Nov 10, 2018 at 10:33 | answer | added | Allure | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 10, 2018 at 8:34 | comment | added | user9646 | @darijgrinberg What about "accepting to review while being unable"? | |
| Nov 10, 2018 at 6:32 | comment | added | darij grinberg | It is not unethical to be unable -- this is almost a type error. Ethics is about what you choose among the options that are available to you. As for reputational impact, all I hear suggests that breaking referee deadlines is more common than meeting them, and generally, promises in academia are generally considered as educated guesses. | |
| Nov 10, 2018 at 6:20 | history | asked | krammer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |