Timeline for Could a paper be rejected due to poor quality of figures?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2018 at 23:10 | comment | added | Azor Ahai -him- | @fridaymeetssunday Oh my god, who ever okayed wood-styled 3D pie charts? | |
| Sep 14, 2018 at 18:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1040661753204539393 | ||
| Sep 14, 2018 at 12:41 | comment | added | fridaymeetssunday | @J-Kun re the color scheme, yes there are other types of color-blindness and red-green was just used as an example (it is also afaik the most common). Changing colors comes for free and there is no reason to alienate a % of one's audience. Ultimately it's about making the paper as easy to ready as possible without dumbing down from the research. | |
| Sep 14, 2018 at 12:38 | comment | added | fridaymeetssunday | @J-Kun For the layered donut plots, it is pretty easy to see the 10% of the volume in the inner ring is not equivalent to 10% in the outer ring making the comparisons meaningless between rings. Furthermore the perspective it adds changes how the same area in the bottom and top of the ring is perceived (Steve Jobs used to use this trick) | |
| Sep 14, 2018 at 12:35 | comment | added | fridaymeetssunday | @J-Kun there are already some studies showing that "the addition of 3-dimensional (3D) perspective depth cues lowered accuracy" ref and it is generally adviseable not to use them ref. | |
| Sep 14, 2018 at 12:11 | comment | added | J-Kun | Could you please elaborate why 3D-barplots and Multi-layer 3D donut plots are a no-go for you? They are not common in scientific papers in my area, but they are neither "incorrect" nor "banned". Also regarding red-green color schemes: Due to color-blindness? There are different types of this visual limitation that might also effect other colors. | |
| Sep 14, 2018 at 9:54 | history | edited | henning no longer feeds AI | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Sep 14, 2018 at 6:21 | vote | accept | fridaymeetssunday | ||
| Sep 13, 2018 at 13:34 | answer | added | Caharpuka | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 13, 2018 at 10:19 | answer | added | Dirk | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 13, 2018 at 10:18 | history | edited | fridaymeetssunday | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
rephrasing to eliminate the notion that a reviewer is rsposible for the rejection of a paper
|
| Sep 13, 2018 at 10:14 | answer | added | Dirk | timeline score: 10 | |
| Sep 13, 2018 at 10:05 | history | asked | fridaymeetssunday | CC BY-SA 4.0 |