Timeline for Exposing my writing in a public git repository after publication?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2018 at 17:28 | comment | added | haff | @dbliss "why not make a cleaned up version of the repo public with just the things that the users want." I guess just because of the extra work involved, but I think this is the right approach. | |
| Jun 29, 2018 at 17:26 | vote | accept | haff | ||
| Jun 29, 2018 at 13:35 | comment | added | abcd | no one is going to care to spend time digging into the evolution of your manuscript . . . and it's very common (in my field) for authors to post PDFs of their finished manuscripts on their personal websites . . . so i don't see a problem with this . . . at the same time, it does seem like extra bulk to the repo that most people interested in your code won't need/want to look at . . . why not make a cleaned up version of the repo public, with just the things that users want? | |
| Jun 29, 2018 at 9:19 | comment | added | AppliedAcademic | Why do you use the word 'expose'? It seems to have a negative connotation here, which would imply that you have some misgivings about it already. On the other hand, you apparently like to share your code. Why the distinction (besides legality/publisher guidelines)? | |
| Jun 29, 2018 at 9:18 | answer | added | Ian Sudbery | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 29, 2018 at 0:42 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/1012496377467801600 | ||
| Jun 28, 2018 at 20:27 | comment | added | Nate Eldredge | Related: academia.stackexchange.com/questions/18426/… | |
| Jun 28, 2018 at 20:21 | answer | added | Nate Eldredge | timeline score: 12 | |
| Jun 28, 2018 at 20:16 | comment | added | FuzzyLeapfrog | You definitely have to check the publisher guidelines. It's like depositing you peer-reviewed author's manuscript in a public repository. | |
| Jun 28, 2018 at 19:31 | comment | added | aaaaa says reinstate Monica | it might be publisher-specific. You should consult them | |
| Jun 28, 2018 at 19:24 | comment | added | Oleg Lobachev | That's almost too open for my taste, but why not? | |
| Jun 28, 2018 at 19:04 | history | asked | haff | CC BY-SA 4.0 |