Timeline for Should I agree to referee a paper when I don't feel I can judge its importance?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2018 at 15:34 | vote | accept | CunningTF | ||
| Apr 9, 2018 at 18:24 | history | edited | cactus_pardner |
Added relevant tag
|
|
| Apr 9, 2018 at 15:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/983365061103235073 | ||
| Apr 9, 2018 at 14:57 | answer | added | guest | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 9, 2018 at 13:21 | answer | added | AppliedAcademic | timeline score: 14 | |
| Apr 9, 2018 at 12:38 | answer | added | Dirk | timeline score: 30 | |
| Apr 9, 2018 at 12:32 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | I suggest that you informally seek the opinion of your supervisors or some other established people in the department, regarding the level of the journal. In my experience almost all journals say that referees should comment on novelty and "weight" as well as correctness, but in practice this is less important for some journals than for others. Personally I think that checking veracity is more important, and you are in a god position because of your specialist knowledge of X; but my view may not be the majority one | |
| Apr 9, 2018 at 11:54 | comment | added | user2768 | My feeling is that you should agree to review the paper. Optionally after (briefly) explaining your competencies/concerns to the editor. | |
| Apr 9, 2018 at 11:52 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 9, 2018 at 12:57 | |||||
| Apr 9, 2018 at 11:46 | history | asked | CunningTF | CC BY-SA 3.0 |