Timeline for How valuable/impressive is a review article written by an undergraduate?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2018 at 23:24 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAcademia/status/960655347940765696 | ||
| Feb 5, 2018 at 22:24 | answer | added | aeismail | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 5, 2018 at 22:12 | comment | added | Bryan Krause♦ | I'm from biology, not chemistry, but I wouldn't say a review article in biology carries a lot of value/impressiveness by itself; prestigious review articles are either those written in top journals, by leaders in a field, or that attract high citation counts. Most likely if the review falls into one of these categories that's more about the supervisor than the student. If you were to read the review for content, it could certainly provide some insight into the student's abilities, but as you mention that may be difficult to do outside the field. I would weight original research much higher. | |
| Feb 5, 2018 at 22:03 | comment | added | OBu | Maybe the title should reflect that you are asking about chemistry? In Computer Science, this would be a plus! | |
| Feb 5, 2018 at 20:21 | history | asked | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |