While your question seems to be on-topic, since it is formulated in the context of academic activities, I doubt that there exist any domain-specific strategies beyond general ones to handle feedback from people (or, generalizing, processing information streams) via analysis and synthesis.
Having said that, I think that there are various possibilities in dealing with feedback from multiple people, but they all stem from general main problem of handling conflicting requirements (obvious edge cases of integrating non-conflicting requirements are rather trivial and are solved by merging information, based on all feedback, provided each piece increases the value of the target artifact).
The above-mentioned possibilities and corresponding strategies IMHO can be based on different perspectives, from philosophical (i.e., thesis, antithesis, synthesis) and other high-level approaches (i.e., Collaborative Information Synthesis) to the ones, based on business practices (i.e., business requirements analysis, including impact, scenario and stakeholders analysis) and software engineering practices (i.e., trade-off analysis) to more technical, such as multiple-criteria decision analysis (the latter approach is likely an overkill for handling traditional academic feedback, but included here for completeness; plus, it might be used for creating automated feedback systems).