Take the 2-minute tour ×
Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. It's 100% free, no registration required.

My research paper was stolen by the co-author and published as his own. What do I do? All the data the paper is based on is my own work. I got it accepted in another journal but now I cannot get it published according to the copyright terms and conditions.

share|improve this question
2  
I'm confused by the word "coauthor" here. Was your paper accepted in another journal with or without the other person's involvement/knowledge/permission? Are they your coauthor on this paper, on a different paper, or something else? –  JeffE Apr 2 '12 at 13:14
    
No permission no prior knowledge of him having submitted my paper to someother journal ...I cannot go against him he is my professor it might have dire consequence to my career –  awesomeness Apr 2 '12 at 14:05
3  
Are you convinced that it was deliberate? Maybe there was a misunderstanding or something. Have you spoken to your professor? –  user107 Apr 2 '12 at 16:33
8  
Definitely talk to your department chair. Find a new advisor, even if it means changing departments. Your advisor will continue to abuse you until you walk out. –  JeffE Apr 2 '12 at 20:05
5  
But you didn't answer my question. When you submitted this work to a journal, did you do it with or without your advisor's knowledge/approval? Is your advisor a co-author on the other paper? If so, then the paper without your name is straight-up double submission, which neither journal editor will like. –  JeffE Apr 2 '12 at 20:07

4 Answers 4

up vote 31 down vote accepted

Let me echo scaaahu's excellent advice: Calm down. Obviously you're scared, and with good reason, but you need to approach the situation calmly and professionally. Otherwise, even if you are in the right it will be difficult for other people to take your concerns seriously.

Your comments suggest (to me) that the situation is not as straightforward as your initial post describes. Without considerably more detail about what happened — which would be inappropriate for you to post here — it's difficult to make specific suggestions.

I think you need to discuss the situation with someone who understands both the politics in your department and the publication culture in your field. Find another senior faculty member in your department (or in a different department, or in the dean's office) who you can trust to keep confidence. (Yes, this can be difficult, but ask around.) Write up a timeline of events in advance, and make copies of documentation for each event in the timeline. Calmly and carefully describe the situation. Just present the facts; don't panic, and don't accuse. (One of the facts is "I'm scared"; that's okay.) Ask your confidant how to proceed. Listen to them.

In the best case, this is a simple misunderstanding, and talking to an informed but neutral third party is the best way to convince you to relax. In the worst case, your department chair is being egregiously unethical, and in particular threatening your chances at graduation, in which case you absolutely need a senior faculty advocate to help you navigate the resulting political mine field. (Your primary goal in this case should be to graduate and get out, not to optimize your grade or to punish your department chair.) Most likely, the actual situation is somewhere in between those two extremes.

Good luck.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks @JeffE i am trying my best not to panic but other teachers dun know about it and are forcing me to get this paper published –  awesomeness Apr 3 '12 at 9:46
    
Do i submit it in the new journal that it got accepted in? i know it is with a risk but all my marks are dependent on it what do i do –  awesomeness Apr 4 '12 at 3:20

The first thing would be to contact the editor of the journal that published your co-author's work, and to explain the problem to them. If the proofs that it is your own research are sufficient, they might consider the previously published paper as plagiarism, which should unblock your own publication. In this process, it might be worth contacting also the journal to which you submitted, so that they can confirm the date at which they received your submission.

Right now, I would say that the best move is to contact the two journals editors with the proofs, and see if they can sort things out. You can also consider in the mean time publishing your paper to an open repository (such as arXiv), if it does not interfere with the copyright policy of the journal you want to publish to.

share|improve this answer
5  
Also, if you and your coauthor work at the same institution, take your evidence to your advisor / department chair / dean. Hopefully you have concrete evidence to back your claim: lab notebooks, dated paper drafts, submission time stamps, archived email conversations, etc. –  JeffE Apr 2 '12 at 13:22
    
It was my work mostly plus he is my professor i cannot report the issue i am stuck in the middle of a big issue –  awesomeness Apr 2 '12 at 14:01
    
Plus i somehow feel my co author knows i have gotten to know about this she is avoiding me .. I have got all the proof thats not an issue –  awesomeness Apr 2 '12 at 14:12
    
I feel all disgusted i did work really hard for this :/ –  awesomeness Apr 2 '12 at 14:48
8  
@awesomeness: you can report the issue, even if the person involved is your professor. And I would say you cannot get out of this situation without reporting it, the only question is to who and how, but the answers up to know give good advice on this. –  Benoît Kloeckner May 27 '12 at 17:45

My first advice is to calm down.

Your question and your comments sound emotional to me. The more emotional you are, the worse situation you would be in. Since the other party is your prof, the burden of proof is on your shoulder. You need to deal with it carefully.

I am not even sure you have a problem. From what you have said in the question and comments, your prof submitted a paper with only his name on the paper to a journal without your prior knowledge. Then he gave you his approval to submit another paper of probably the same contents to another journal with both your name and his name on it(you said he is the co-author).

The above is what I understood from your question and your comments. If all are true, the issue is his problem, not yours. Because he is the one who did the double submission, not you. All you have to do to clear up this issue is to present evidence which shows that you got his approval before you submitted the paper to the journal.

share|improve this answer
    
do i submit the paper to the journal where it got accepted? –  awesomeness Apr 3 '12 at 5:15
    
@awesomeness, this is the question for the editors of the journal. Would you accept two papers of the same or similar contents if you were the editor? –  scaaahu Apr 3 '12 at 5:46
    
i know i woudnt like that however what if i did not know it had already gotten published –  awesomeness Apr 3 '12 at 5:59
    
what do i do then :/ –  awesomeness Apr 3 '12 at 6:05
6  
+1 for "Calm down". –  JeffE Apr 3 '12 at 7:11

Intellectual theft is actually a very common thing, very unfortunately. We would think people have creativity and respect for other people's works in Academia. I used to think that it was a place for intellectuals, and therefore a place of highest amount of refinement, politeness, and respect for rules and others. That is all very wrong. Fact is that Academia is a political place: They like you, what usually means they fear you, then you will have respect. Some people impose fear by making all their presentations impossible to understand, so that they use complex words, skip fundamental bridges in mathematical proofs, and etc. Some have gangs, entire gangs inside of the own university. I am suffering intellectual theft for more than twelve years in democracy and capitalism, along with others, and it all started at the university, with my excellent results in research. If your supervisor or your fellow does that to you inside of a certain tertiary institution, it is probably because they are covered, believe it or not. That means they are politically loved. If you can prove that the results are yours (dates, documents, witnesses or whatever), you can go to the courts, for instance, depending on where this all takes place. You can also try the Science Council, ethical organs, and others. Some people end up in the media because, once more, they have the 'right' political connections. You can also try mediation. In Australia we now have plenty of private companies that specialize in that.

share|improve this answer
7  
You have too much rant in your answer. –  scaaahu Dec 1 at 1:32

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.