Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I received this comment from a reviewer: “ It is better to add a nomenclature section with a list of all the used symbols and their meaning as example (DVB-T, DVB-S2, BCH, OSFBC, LDPC...), consequently the paper should be re-arranged eliminating all the definitions given in the sections”.

Are there any specific position for this section ?

share|improve this question

The correct position for a nomenclature section is the location normally used by the journal in question. While as Paul suggests, the logical location for this should be at the start of the paper, in many journals, the nomenclature section is placed at the end, largely because it does not "look as good" to have the nomenclature section right on the first page (which is optically the "prime real estate" of the paper).

share|improve this answer

If you add such a section, it would need to be directly after the abstract. This way, any nomenclature is explained before it is used in the main text.

share|improve this answer
Wouldn't it be after the introduction, and just before one launches into the main technical descriptions ? – Suresh Feb 17 '13 at 22:55
One would probably also want to use abbreviations in the introduction, so a place after the abstract but before the introduction seems best to me. – Paul Hiemstra Feb 18 '13 at 6:17
it seems that is the right place for this section (after the abstract), thank you for your help – wassim Feb 18 '13 at 8:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.