Perhaps to make the question more broad, are there general rules guiding similar cases?
Sorry for confusion, I just mean the English word. Example:
A proof sans definitions is imprecise.
A proof sans definitions is imprecise.
|
Perhaps to make the question more broad, are there general rules guiding similar cases? Sorry for confusion, I just mean the English word. Example:
|
|||||||||||||
|
Questions on Academia Stack Exchange are expected to relate to academics within the scope defined in the FAQ. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about closed questions here.
|
Sans has only one clear meaning in a non-technical dictionary: it means “without”. From the New Oxford American Dictionary:
First: there is nothing specific to academic writing regarding italicization of sans. It is a regular question of writing style in English. It depends from person to person, or to your writing style or publisher guidelines (if they are specific enough to cover such borderline cases). The reason it can be italicized is that it is borrowed from French (where it means the same). However, given that it was imported into English in the 14th century, I would argue that it's not a loan word anymore and doesn't require italicization. But it's pretty much a matter of personal preference. |
|||||||||||||||||
|