I am having some disagreement with my VP Academic. She claims that being one of three or four authors (not necessarily the first) in a published paper has the same value of being the only author.
Does anyone know of academic evaluation criteria for publications published or used by reputable institutions? Or, can anyone suggest other effective ways to prove her wrong?
Post comments edit:
1) I publish in the field of statistical methods with data analysis included. My papers are being compared with papers in social sciences.
2) For value I mean time and effort put in writing the papers and getting them published.
3) I would like to find out if there exist some guidelines or criteria for evaluating publications, maybe considering the discipline.