Take the 2-minute tour ×
Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have been invited to write a book chapter in an edited volume relating to my field of work. I have a paper ready that I have not published and was planning to submit it soon. So I am wondering is it worth to use that article for the book chapter as both are on the same topic or is it in a sense a waste of a journal paper as book chapters might not be seen to have the same academic value? What should I do should i instead send the ready paper to a journal for a review and write a book chapter based on a couple papers i have published for instance?

Generally speaking where does a book chapter stand? Is it something between a conference paper and a full-fledged journal article? Or does does it have the same value in your opinion?

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 7 down vote accepted

Like a lot of things in academia, I think this will heavily depend on what discipline you're in. In computer science for example, while there's nothing wrong with a book chapter, a paper at a conference or in a journal is typically more valuable.

The reason normally given is that papers are peer reviewed (as compared to edited), so they are somehow more 'valid'.

Having said that, there's always myriad exceptions. Writing a whole book that everyone uses is much better than a few papers. Later in the career, book chapters perhaps gain value as they're a mark of respect and prestige (once you've already proven your research ability).

As a counter-point though, from my limited experience, it seems that book chapters are much more common in bioinformatics and operations research, and thus are viewed more highly.

Talk to fellow academics in your area, their opinion will be the best guide.

share|improve this answer
6  
Even within computer science, many book chapters are also formally refereed. It just depends on the book. –  JeffE Jan 11 '13 at 5:17
add comment

In my field a peer reviewed article counts for a lot more than a chapter in an edited book. That said, a published chapter in an edited book counts a lot more for job searches than a working/submitted/under review/under revision manuscript. Often edited books lead to a publication in press much quicker than a journal. I would definitely look into the time scale of the book chapter.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.