Tell me more ×
Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. It's 100% free, no registration required.

My goal is to produce a graph showing the linkages (and lack there of) between several fields that share a common subproblem by showing who cites whom. There are many databases that show citations between papers: ISI Web of Knowledge, Microsoft Academic Research, and Google Scholar. However none allows me to download even part of their database. Is there some database I have overlooked? Has someone written a scrapper for one of these websites?

For reference, the fields I'm considering are Mechanics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Signal Processing, Geophysics, and several others.

share|improve this question
I've always wondered why google scholar doesn't provide the functionality to see "who has this paper cited" in addition to "who has cited this paper". – Andy W Jul 20 '12 at 14:34

1 Answer

Scraping Google Scholar

I found this:

https://github.com/tonybreyal/Blog-Reference-Functions/blob/master/R/googleScholarXScraper/googleScholarXScraper.R

I also wrote something a while back, though it's not pretty:

https://github.com/ketch/scinet/blob/master/gss.py

Using either of these you could trace citations forward through the literature. Note that Scholar will block you if you hit it too many times, too quickly.


You can download thousands of records at a time from Scopus, if you have access:

  1. Run a search.
  2. Tick the box to select all documents.
  3. Click "create bibliography".
  4. Export to desired format.

However, this doesn't include citation information, so it's probably useless to you.


share|improve this answer
scraping Google scholar is against the EULA, you might not get caught if you do a little bit, but there are decent consequences if you do get caught (I had a colleague who got his lab in trouble with such an approach) and your librarians can't save you. – Artem Kaznatcheev Jul 21 '12 at 1:45
@ArtemKaznatcheev That link leads to a stackoverflow question which has a dead link to (supposedly) the EULA. So I can't find evidence supporting your claim (though I suspect it is true). – David Ketcheson Jul 23 '12 at 12:16
My Google-fu has not been sufficient to find a new ToS, this might be due to Google's recent unified ToS approach. I asked a question here. – Artem Kaznatcheev Jul 23 '12 at 14:00

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.