Take the 2-minute tour ×
Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If a private company provides a grant for some research to be carried out but is hoping for a particular outcome from the research in order to take certain business decisions, should this be described as a conflict of interest?

share|improve this question
4  
A conflict of interest in what context? But, yeah, by and large it sounds like a conflict of interest (but not an uncommon one). –  xLeitix Jun 18 at 11:06
    
In the context that it should be described as such when publishing the results of the research i.e. should the paper describe who the grant was given by and why they gave it within a conflicts of interest sub-section? –  Michael Jun 18 at 11:09
2  
You definitely need to mention it in the paper. –  Piotr Migdal Jun 18 at 13:04
6  
Hoping for a particular outcome is not a conflict of interest. Paying for a particular outcome is. –  JeffE Jun 18 at 13:21
3  
And it's not just private companies, it's ANY source of funding. If greenpeace funds your study into the effects of tuna fishing on the tuna population you can assume they want you to conclude that tuna fishing is bad for example, because it's a well known campaign platform for them to want to get it banned. –  jwenting Jun 18 at 13:35
add comment

5 Answers 5

I don't see this as a conflict of interest, but the issue itself is deserving of careful attention from both a contracts perspective and a scientific perspective. I would advise against any such funding source that puts restrictions on the publication of findings. In particular, you state that the business is "hoping for a particular outcome." Are you still allowed to publish results that are contrary to their expectations -- or, does the contract specifically state they have authority over what can and cannot be published. You will want your grants management officers to carefully scrutinize the contract.

Science is really about answering questions through an open, replicable and systematic process. It is not about providing evidence for an expected outcome. I think this type of funding will be more problematic than helpful for a scientific career.

share|improve this answer
4  
I don't think it has to be bad. They may be hoping for it, but not coerce you to get that result. –  Davidmh Jun 18 at 12:57
add comment

A company exists to make money. They fund a research in the hope that the outcome will be beneficial for them (as a student works on a project in the hope that there will be good results out of it). There is nothing intrinsically bad there.

The problem may be with the rest of the conditions. But it will be perfectly fine if: (a) They guarantee you are free to publish whatever you consider and (b) they don't force you to get "good results".

share|improve this answer
5  
heck, I've seen papers that could not be published not because of a conflict of interest with the funder of the study, but with one between the conclusions of the paper and a major advertiser of the publishing company it was submitted to... –  jwenting Jun 18 at 13:37
add comment

Yes, it is a clear conflict of interests:

a situation occurring when an individual or organization is involved in multiple interests, one of which could possibly corrupt the motivation.

It does not disqualify your research (as long you make it with full scrutiny, etc; see other answers), but for the sake of scientific honesty you need to mention it (as it can possibly alter your motivation, e.g. to get further grants from the same company or to condition probability of publishing on the outcome).

I saw such notes, e.g. that a given scientist works for a particular drug company.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The company should not impact your choice of research methodology, interpretation of results and the dissemination avenues. If the funding agreement is clear on that, then the "hopes" of a company are isolated from the research stream, and I do not see any evident conflict of interest.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Yours and their interests do conflict but this is not how we usually use the work "conflict of interest." Say if your company actually makes cat food, and then you later got recruited as a consultant on setting up a safe cat food policy, your decisions made in the policy task force can be potentially affected by your financial involvement with the company. In that case, you will need to declare to the policy task force that you have a conflict of interest. In most cases, conflict of interest requires more than two parties, or one of the parties having two or more roles.

In your case it sounds more like a threatening to academic freedom and scientific integrity. Some preventive measures should be done now before things turn ugly. Here are some things that I have been doing in various projects, you may consider following any of them.

  1. Set up a "statement of understanding." It's a binding contract describing who should have the interpretive rights to the data, and how to safeguard everyone's interest. There isn't a template for that, you'll need to lay out items you cannot risk to lose (e.g. your reputation, your institute's reputation, etc.) and contrast with the company's intentions. Talk to your institute's PR or legal representatives for a consultation.

  2. Highlight your value as the neutral middle man. In that sense, express to them firmly that you would like to explore the quality of the product without any prejudice. And explain to them that if their product is substandard, it's better to know now than later when found out by consumer interest group.

  3. Agree upon ALL the protocols, big or small, prior to any analysis. The turmoil I got into mostly about reanalyzing data. Some people just don't give up... and if you look at the same thing for enough iterations, good findings can come out just due to chance. Follow the protocols strictly, and meet to agree again on any modification.

  4. Keep all documents, e-mails, lab books, etc. and keep copies of them.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.