Take the 2-minute tour ×
Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Some years ago, I studied in a small training center that had a "cooperative arrangement" with a larger university. I earned a graduate certificate bearing the name of the university along with graduate credits and a transcript from the university, but attended courses in the training center. I put these details on my CV:

2005        Graduate Certificate in X        <location>, University of X

Recently, the training center and university ended their cooperative arrangement and the training center has a new partnership with another university. Do I need to adjust my CV to reflect the change?

share|improve this question
Why would you change? The current change in the training center's affiliation does not change the education you got in the past. –  Taladris Jun 12 at 14:52
Actually, if you got the exact same training as in the university (same examinations, same courses,...), maybe it would not be unethical to suppress the name of the training center on your CV. The exact location of your classroom does not matter! Granted (again) you got the exact same education as at the university... You have a transcript from the university, which means THEY certify that the quality of your education was at the same level than the one they offer on their main campus. –  Taladris Jun 12 at 14:55

4 Answers 4

up vote 9 down vote accepted

I think the best approach is to keep the original CV entry, as this represents the actual qualification that you received. However, you might choose to add a note explaining the history, if you think this is likely to be helpful to prospective readers.

I agree that in the case described by @brechmos, where a university has changed its name, providing this information is likely to be useful. It's less clear to me that this is true in the OP's case: it seems (essentially) that the qualification he has used to be accredited by University X, and is now accredited by University Y. It's not clear to me why this would be useful information to someone reading the CV. I guess it might be relevant if the training centre has a high enough profile that people now naturally associate it with University Y, and would think that something listed with University X must be a different centre. Otherwise, I suspect noting the change is more likely to confuse people than help them...

share|improve this answer
This is correct: your CV should reflect the actual degrees received, from the institutions that awarded them. The clarification would be needed if the institute change is not recent, and would thus have fallen out of memory. –  aeismail Jun 12 at 23:17
To add to this: I'd even think it possibly detrimental to your application if the institution on the copies of the degree certificates you hand in seem to differ from those on the CV. –  cbeleites Jun 13 at 5:37

Funny, this just happened to me!

On my CV/resume I now have the title of the section as":

Masters of Science, University of XXXXX (now called XXXX University)

My degree is from "University of XXXX" and so I feel that should go first. BUT, it would be a good idea to acknowledge the name change, as people will get confused, and so I added it as a parenthetical comment.

share|improve this answer
This applies to a name change, but would be misleading in the case of a change of affiliation (as in the OP's case) –  ff524 Jun 12 at 14:23
True. I would still leave the original affiliation as that was the case while the OP was there. A note below on the CV might be helpful to say the affiliation ended - that way it is clear (and if someone is Google'ing around they aren't going to get confused). –  brechmos Jun 12 at 14:26
I would be so temped to use "née" even though it does not quite fit... –  dmckee Jun 13 at 0:05

To use the example provided by brechmos.

Master of Science, XXXX University (formerly University of XXXXX)

Have used this alternative in my cv.

share|improve this answer
2005   Graduate Certificate in X   <location>, at that time affiliated with University of Y
share|improve this answer
This answer does not look right. My understanding is that the training center was affiliated with University of X at that time. Also, the OP is asking if he needs to adjust his CV, you did not address his question. –  scaaahu Jun 13 at 6:34
@scaaahu The question uses X for both the subject studied and the affiliated university; I've used X for the subject and Y for the university. No material difference. –  David Richerby Jun 13 at 6:37
Can you add some explanation as to what reasoning is behind the answer. –  StrongBad Jun 13 at 14:04
@StrongBad What part needs explaining? –  David Richerby Jun 14 at 4:29
Umm, the whole thing. It is not that big of an answer. You leave out the research center name and do not list the new university name. Why is that? As it stands, the answer feels like a comment. –  StrongBad Jun 14 at 4:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.