Take the 2-minute tour ×
Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In academic writing, is it proper to cite something to provide it as an example of something else? For instance, we have lines like this in a number of our papers:

Many research endeavors, including environmental and coastal hazard prediction [1], climate modeling [2], high-energy physics simulations [3,4], and genome mapping [5] generate large data volumes on a yearly basis.

Each citation is merely providing an example of a research project that generates large volumes of data (more often than not, it's not even a paper, just a URL), and content from the cited source is not otherwise used anywhere in the paper.

I suppose I tend to think of citations as references to work whose content contributes to a significant portion of content in the paper. A citation then indicates some kind of "weighty" relation between the paper and the thing being cited. In the example I provided, it seems to me that invoking the "weighty" power of citation simply to say "yes, such a data producing project of this type does in fact exist, in case you were wondering"--and doing so five times--is somewhat excessive and that it might serve better as a footmark.

To me it seems these should either be footnotes or just be left out. In any case, it seems they should not go in the bibliography.

share|improve this question
10  
A citation then indicates some kind of "weighty" relation between the paper and the thing being cited. Not at all. A citation simply indicates that you are saying something that is not common knowledge and not an original contribution of your work. If you give examples that are not common knowledge, you should certainly cite them. –  ff524 May 29 at 23:27
6  
Though citations are valued in academia, no distinction is being made between the reasons behind a citation. Even if you reference some publication only to thouroughly deconstruct it, it still “gets” a normal citation and all its positive aspects. –  Wrzlprmft May 29 at 23:37

3 Answers 3

up vote 18 down vote accepted

I am not sure about other disciplines, but this is certainly neither uncommon nor in any way frowned upon in my field (Computer Science).

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for your response. I'm in computer science as well. I'm just concerned about having "too many" citations I guess. –  user15888 May 29 at 22:13
9  
Why do you care about "too many citations" ? there's no limit on cites :) ? And I agree with xLeitix that this is neither uncommon or frowned upon. –  Suresh May 29 at 22:18
    
And if the editor thinks they are superfluous, it is trivial to take them away. –  Davidmh May 30 at 9:16
    
@Suresh: there are cases of overdose of citations. Some articles have ridiculously long bibliography. It may look like sort of name dropping of famous researchers; or on the other side, citations of irrelevant articles of friends working in the same area. –  Taladris May 30 at 9:36
    
But this is hardly an example of that. –  Suresh May 30 at 9:55

I agree with the other answers. It is better to provide citations to good articles that back up or give examples of your statements. In the example you have shown, the use of the citation is allowing the reader to see for themselves what you mean without you having to provide painstaking details that may detract from the main point of your writing. I, myself, have written some articles that have been very heavy on citations, and were not criticized for it.

share|improve this answer

This is common practise as has already been established by other answers. In fields where the Harvard style is used it is common to add "e.g." (for example) to the references so that the example would read

Many research endeavors, including environmental and coastal hazard prediction (e.g., Smith et al., 1989), climate modelling (e.g., Doe and Smith, 2007), high-energy physics simulations (e.g., Svensson, 2005; Fischer, 2006), and genome mapping (e.g., Iglesias, 2010) generate large data volumes on a yearly basis.

It is not uncommon to add more than one example although there is no "law" either way.

With the Harvard style it becomes easier to see that these are just examples, one of possibly many alternatives.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.