Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Imagine you have a paper that got rejected from a top tier conference. You think it is of high quality.

Do you submit the paper to arXiv, or keep pushing for a conference later on?

share|improve this question
I do have seen a paper rejected from a conference on arXiv, but I am not sure why they do that. – Sibbs Gambling Apr 8 '14 at 15:54
Why not do both? – Peteris Apr 8 '14 at 18:09
You mean you didn't post it to arXiv before you submitted it the first time? – JeffE Apr 9 '14 at 0:37

Submitting a paper to the arXiv does not preclude publishing it later in a journal or in the proceedings of a conference. In fact, one should not think of a paper which appears on the arXiv as being published. (There's no peer review, for one thing.)

In my community (hep-th, mostly) one always submits to the arXiv first, gathers comments, and only then submits for publication. Of course, other communities might work differently.

In the fields I am familiar with (maths and physics, mostly), I would submit the paper to the arXiv in any case. You can then decide how to actually publish the paper.

share|improve this answer
Well I may consider publishing the paper later on, but for now my main reason is to protect the idea/novelty of the work. Is this a good reason for using arXiv ? BTW, I am in CS, theory field. – NeoN Apr 8 '14 at 17:09
I'm not sure what you mean by protecting the idea. Do you mean that you want not to disseminate it? (which seems odd since you are submitting for publication elsewhere) or simply that you want to ensure you are given credit? If the latter, the arXiv has a time stamp. In fact, if your topic is "hot" and the chances of being scooped are high, I'd recommend submitting to arXiv as soon as possible. – José Figueroa-O'Farrill Apr 8 '14 at 17:47
If you're in CS theory, then it's increasingly becoming the practice to post things on the arxiv at submission time. In fact at least one recent venue strongly recommends it. – Suresh Apr 8 '14 at 18:34
@NeoN: In my opinion (too...), posting something to the arxiv is currently the best way to secure the novelty of your work. – Pete L. Clark Apr 9 '14 at 4:24

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.